Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. colomb. psiquiatr ; 52(2)jun. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1536126

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La terapia electroconvulsiva es un procedimiento efectivo y seguro, el cual se indica principalmente a pacientes con episodios depresivos tanto unipolares como bipolares, manía y esquizofrenia, cuando no responden a otros tratamientos. Objetivo: Describir las propiedades demográficas, sociales y clínicas de un grupo de pacientes tratados con terapia electroconvulsiva con anestesia y relajación (TECAR) en la Clínica Universidad de La Sabana por un periodo de 8 arios. Métodos: Se revisan las bases de datos y los registros de los procedimientos desde el 1 de enero de 2009 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2017. Se realiza un análisis con estadística descriptiva. Resultados: En este periodo se realizaron 1.322 procedimientos a 143 pacientes, el 54,5% de ellos mujeres, y con diagnóstico asociado de depresión mayor en el 57% de los pacientes. El número de tratamientos por persona fue 9,2 y en el 3,8% se presentaron complicaciones, sin que se requiriese tratamiento invasivo en ninguna de ellas. Conclusiones: La terapia electroconvulsiva se aplica con seguridad a los pacientes y con parámetros diversos en cuanto a edad, sexo y diagnóstico más frecuente, en comparación con otros países de Latinoamérica y el mundo. Es importante sumar esfuerzos en investigación que permitan tener un panorama más completo de las características de su aplicación en el país.


Electroconvulsive therapy is an effective and safe procedure, which is indicated mainly in patients with both unipolar and bipolar depressive episodes, mania and schizophrenia, when they do not respond to other treatments. Objective: To describe the demographic, social and clinical properties of a group of patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with anaesthetic and muscular relaxant at the Universidad de La Sabana Clinic for a period of 8 years. Methods: The databases and records of the procedures were reviewed from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2017. An analysis was performed with descriptive statistics. Results: In this period, 1,322 procedures were performed on 143 patients (54.5% women) with an associated diagnosis of major depression in 57%. The number of treatments per person was 9.2 and complications occurred in 3.8%, without any of them requiring invasive management. Conclusions: Electroconvulsive therapy is performed safely in patients and with different parameters in terms of age, gender and diagnosis, in comparison to other countries in Latin America and the world. It is important to join efforts in research that allow a more complete overview of the characteristics of its application in the country.

2.
Acta méd. colomb ; 46(4): 18-25, Oct.-Dec. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1374085

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives: to validate the diagnostic yield of the PERC score for ruling out pulmonary embolism in low-risk patients at high altitudes (>2500 meters above sea level [ASL]). Methods: a cross-sectional study with diagnostic test analysis in patients over the age of 18 with suspected pulmonary embolism on admission or during hospitalization, who underwent chest computed tomography angiography between August 2009 and January 2020 in a tertiary care hospital located on the Bogotá savannah. The yield of the PERC score was assessed, calculated with an SaO2<95% and an SaO2<90% in patients with different risk levels according to the Wells, Geneva and Pisa scores for pulmonary embolism. Results: one thousand eighty-seven were included in the final analysis, 42% with PE. Patients classified as low-risk using the Wells score had a PERC ACOR calculated with SaO2<95% of 0.56 (95%CI:0.50-0.62) (p=0.049), and calculated with SaO2<90% of 0.60 (95%CI:0.54-0.66) (p=0.002). The ACOR for subjects classified as low-risk using the Geneva score, with a PERC calculated with SaO2<95%, was: 0.53 (95%CI:0.45-0.60) (p=0.459) and for a PERC calculated with SaO2<90% it was: 0.55 (95%CI:0.47-0.62) (P=0.218). The ACOR for subjects with a less than 10% probability of PE according to the Pisa score classification, with a PERC calculated with SaO2<95%, was: 0.54 (95%CI:0.44-0.64)(p=0.422), and for a PERC calculated with SaO2<90% it was: 0.56 (95%CI:0.46-0.66)(p=0.236). Conclusions: the PERC score calculated with an oxygen saturation <90% has a similar diagnostic yield to the PERC score calculated with an oxygen saturation <95% for ruling out PE in patients classified as low-risk by the Wells score at high altitudes (>2,500 meters ASL). (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2010).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL